Skip to content

fix: use @model.bucket instead of CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket in delete_all#26

Merged
pimpin merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/delete-all-use-model-bucket
Feb 24, 2026
Merged

fix: use @model.bucket instead of CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket in delete_all#26
pimpin merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
fix/delete-all-use-model-bucket

Conversation

@pimpin
Copy link
Collaborator

@pimpin pimpin commented Feb 23, 2026

Problem

CouchbaseOrm_Relation#delete_all was hardcoding CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket instead of using @model.bucket, making it inconsistent with every other storage access in the same class (to_n1ql, update_all, execute, first, last).

Root cause

This was a historical oversight. delete_all was introduced in the very first commit of the relation class (468dbbd - Add basic relation, Sep 2022), before @model.bucket existed. When @model.bucket was added in subsequent commits, all new methods adopted it but delete_all was never updated — it kept working silently because in a single-cluster setup both references resolve to the same bucket.

Fix

One-line change: replace CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket with @model.bucket in delete_all.

Impact

  • Makes delete_all consistent with the rest of CouchbaseOrm_Relation
  • Enables per-model dynamic connection routing (e.g. routing specific models to a dedicated Couchbase Capella cluster)
  • No behavioral change in existing single-cluster setups

…delete_all

`delete_all` was the only method in `CouchbaseOrm_Relation` still using
the global `CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket`. All other storage accesses
(`to_n1ql`, `update_all`, `execute`, `first`, `last`) correctly use
`@model.bucket` or `@model.cluster`.

This inconsistency was a historical oversight: `delete_all` was
introduced in the first commit of the relation class before
`@model.bucket` existed, and was never updated when the abstraction
was added in later commits.

This fix makes `delete_all` consistent with the rest of the class and
enables per-model dynamic connection routing (e.g. Couchbase Capella).
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @pimpin, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a long-standing inconsistency in the CouchbaseOrm_Relation class by updating the delete_all method to correctly utilize the model's specific bucket. This change aligns delete_all with the class's other methods, ensuring a unified approach to data access and, more importantly, unlocking the capability for dynamic routing of models to different Couchbase clusters without impacting existing single-cluster configurations.

Highlights

  • Inconsistent Bucket Access: The delete_all method in CouchbaseOrm_Relation was hardcoding CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket for bucket access, which was inconsistent with other methods in the same class that correctly used @model.bucket.
  • Enabling Dynamic Connection Routing: This fix enables per-model dynamic connection routing, allowing specific models to be routed to dedicated Couchbase Capella clusters, enhancing flexibility in multi-cluster environments.
  • Historical Oversight Corrected: The inconsistency was a historical oversight from the initial implementation of delete_all before @model.bucket existed, and it went unnoticed in single-cluster setups.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Changelog
  • lib/couchbase-orm/relation.rb
    • Updated the delete_all method to use @model.bucket instead of CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket for accessing the Couchbase bucket.
    • Resolved an inconsistency in bucket access within the CouchbaseOrm_Relation class.
    • Enabled support for per-model dynamic connection routing to different Couchbase clusters.
Activity
  • No human activity has been recorded on this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@pimpin pimpin marked this pull request as ready for review February 23, 2026 17:36
Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly updates delete_all to use @model.bucket instead of the global CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket, which improves consistency and enables per-model connection routing. The change is well-justified and aligns with the behavior of other methods in the class. I have one suggestion to further simplify the code in the delete_all method.

CouchbaseOrm::logger.debug{ "Delete all: #{self}" }
ids = query.to_a
CouchbaseOrm::Connection.bucket.default_collection.remove_multi(ids) unless ids.empty?
@model.bucket.default_collection.remove_multi(ids) unless ids.empty?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The unless ids.empty? check is unnecessary. The Couchbase SDK's remove_multi method handles an empty array of IDs gracefully by performing a no-op. Removing this conditional check simplifies the code and relies on the idiomatic behavior of the SDK.

                @model.bucket.default_collection.remove_multi(ids)

@pimpin pimpin merged commit 5334f36 into master Feb 24, 2026
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants